Add test for decreasing fillValue animation

[Copilot]

• Identify divergence between branch and animation-fix base
• Resolve merge conflict in SegmentedArc.spec.js
• Keep the decreasing fillValue test while accepting all animation-fix changes
• Verify all 48 tests pass

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[jkhusanov]

@copilot, I just merged a PR to my base branch. Check if these tests are still actual or no longer needed

[Copilot]

@copilot, I just merged a PR to my base branch. Check if these tests are still actual or no longer needed

I checked the base branch and found that PR #144 was merged, which changed the animation behavior from blocking to cancellation.

I've updated the PR to:

• Remove the 2 tests about animation blocking/completion (no longer applicable with the new cancellation behavior)
• Keep the decreasing fillValue test (still useful - complements the existing increasing test)
• Sync with the latest animation-fix base which now includes the "cancels in-flight animation" test

The PR now adds only one meaningful test: verifying that animations work correctly when fillValue decreases. Commit: 0db82f0

[jkhusanov]

@copilot please update the pr and verify if these tests are still needed, if not please close th PR.

[Copilot]

@copilot please update the pr and verify if these tests are still needed, if not please close th PR.

After checking the current state of the base branch (animation-fix), the PR is still needed — but only for one test.

What the base branch has:

• "re-runs animation when fillValue changes dynamically" (tests increase: 25 → 75)
• "cancels in-flight animation when fillValue changes before animation completes"

What this PR uniquely adds:

• "re-runs animation when fillValue decreases dynamically" (tests decrease: 75 → 25)

The two previously redundant tests (blocking/completion behavior) were already removed in commit 0db82f0. The remaining test genuinely fills a gap in coverage by verifying the decreasing direction — since the base only tests the increasing case, it's possible a regression could slip through for decreasing values.

If you'd prefer not to merge this test at all, the PR can be closed. Otherwise the single test it adds is still valid and passes.

[jkhusanov]

@copilot resolve conflicts

[Copilot]

@copilot resolve conflicts

Conflicts resolved. The branch now cleanly merges into animation-fix — the only difference is the single decreasing fillValue test. All 48 tests pass.