Skip to content

Conversation

@marksvc
Copy link
Collaborator

@marksvc marksvc commented Jan 12, 2026

This change is Reviewable

@marksvc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

marksvc commented Jan 12, 2026

When testing #3628 I found it helpful to be able to test a scenario using an unzipping tool that used SharpZipLib. (And in combination with another zip tool.)

It may be useful to retain the tool for future testing/experimenting as well.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.82%. Comparing base (9ccc759) to head (f51456b).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3629   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.82%   82.82%           
=======================================
  Files         609      609           
  Lines       37426    37426           
  Branches     6159     6154    -5     
=======================================
  Hits        30998    30998           
+ Misses       5494     5481   -13     
- Partials      934      947   +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@marksvc marksvc marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2026 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants