Skip to content

Conversation

@erasmospunk
Copy link

No description provided.

@sneurlax
Copy link

sneurlax commented Jan 14, 2018

Duplicate of #19 ?

@erasmospunk
Copy link
Author

erasmospunk commented Jan 17, 2018

@sneurlax #19 had no updates from July. This tries to be as close to the C++ code as possible and uses byte arrays for higher efficiency. Also it it uses logical right shifts (>>>) and is careful with java byte to int sign extensions.

@erasmospunk
Copy link
Author

@sipa could you provide some feedback if anything is needed to merge this?

@schildbach
Copy link

I'm now in the process of integrating this code into bitcoinj.

schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2018
…ress too).

Note the class names a subject to change, e.g.
AbstractAddress > Address
Address > LegacyAddress

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
This commit establishes a base class for legacy and segwit addresses.

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
This commit establishes a base class for legacy and segwit addresses.

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
This commit establishes a base class for legacy and segwit addresses.

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to schildbach/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
This commit establishes a base class for legacy and segwit addresses.

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
schildbach pushed a commit to bitcoinj/bitcoinj that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2018
This commit establishes a base class for legacy and segwit addresses.

Uses Bech32 code from sipa/bech32#40.
@erasmospunk
Copy link
Author

Hey @sipa, care to check this PR for merging?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants