Conversation
Fix issue with GCode precision.
|
Hi Richard, I am working on merging this. So far I have removed the PIL dependancy and I am playing with grayscale. Do you think grayscale raster instead of monochrome is feasible? Have you tried it? |
|
Hi Stefan, I'm intrigued as how you've removed PIL - I'll take a look I haven't tried grayscale. When I was experimenting with raster in the firmware, I found it very I have PWM power control into the analog input of my laser PSU so If I understand your setup correctly, you are using PWM and different On 04/06/14 10:20, Stefan Hechenberger wrote:
|
|
Thnaks for the info. I think I'll give grayscale a try. We'll see.
Hacking with your code I ended up shaving a yak. It reminded me of many Best, On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Richard Taylor
|
Hi Stephan,
This is a clean re-write of my .svg raster image implementation against the re-architected LasaurApp.
The implementation adds a dependency on the Python Imaging Library (apt-get install python-imaging).
It still requires the G08 implementation to be added to the standard firmware. I've done an implementation for my Cortex-M4 based board, which may be useful as a reference. I would be happy to work with someone on the official firmware.
There is another branch "raster-dev" in my repository that adds a "pixels per inch" setting in addition to what is on this branch.
PPI has been very useful on my machine for vector cuts as well as setting the dot pitch for image rasters.
I suspect the jury would be out on its usefulness for the Lasersaur though.
Kind regards.
Richard.