Skip to content

Conversation

@jadamcrain
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @jadamcrain, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a comprehensive polish of the project's documentation. The changes aim to significantly improve the clarity, conciseness, and accuracy of various guide and API reference pages. By streamlining language, correcting grammatical issues, and refining explanations of core DNP3 concepts and library functionalities, the documentation becomes more accessible and helpful for both new and experienced users.

Highlights

  • Documentation Clarity and Conciseness: Numerous sections across the documentation have been rephrased to be more direct, concise, and easier to understand, removing redundant words and improving sentence structure.
  • Grammar and Phrasing Corrections: Several grammatical errors, typos, and awkward phrasings have been corrected to enhance the overall professionalism and readability of the documentation.
  • Specific DNP3 Concept Clarifications: Explanations for DNP3-specific concepts like outstation behavior over TCP/IP, virtual RTUs, dependency management, logging, protocol decoding, and API configurations (AssociationConfig, ReadHandler, OutstationConfig, EventBufferConfig, ControlHandler, Database) have been refined for better comprehension.
  • TLS Configuration Details: Improvements were made to the TLS documentation, including clearer explanations of name validation rules and a correction to an openssl command for generating outstation certificates.
  • Runtime and Language Binding Details: The documentation for the Runtime lifecycle, blocking calls, and shutdown procedures has been made more explicit. Additionally, clarifications were added for C and C++ language bindings regarding class handling and asynchronous methods.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request provides an excellent polish to the documentation. The changes across numerous files make the text more concise, direct, and easier to read. Several typos and grammatical errors have been corrected, which significantly improves the overall quality and professionalism of the documentation. All changes are positive, and I have no further suggestions. Great work!

@jadamcrain jadamcrain merged commit c92a753 into main Dec 22, 2025
31 checks passed
@jadamcrain jadamcrain deleted the feature/docs branch December 22, 2025 00:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants