Skip to content

(closes #3281) Increase rank in zdftke and fix solfrac issue#3309

Open
sergisiso wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
3281_more_tmp_rank_increases
Open

(closes #3281) Increase rank in zdftke and fix solfrac issue#3309
sergisiso wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
3281_more_tmp_rank_increases

Conversation

@sergisiso
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.95%. Comparing base (59f796e) to head (497c903).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3309   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.95%   99.95%           
=======================================
  Files         380      380           
  Lines       53949    53951    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        53927    53929    +2     
  Misses         22       22           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sergisiso sergisiso requested a review from arporter January 29, 2026 16:18
@sergisiso sergisiso self-assigned this Jan 29, 2026
@sergisiso
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is ready for a first review. One for @arporter

@arporter
Copy link
Member

arporter commented Feb 3, 2026

It all looks fine and it's great we can deal with the costly routine in NEMO5, However, there appears to be a performance regression for the various NEMO4 offload ITs:
image
(3rd set of bars from the left). Please could you take a look?

Copy link
Member

@arporter arporter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks good, just the performance regression to consider.

if (isinstance(check.parent, IntrinsicCall) and
check.parent.is_inquiry and
"dim" in check.parent.argument_names):
# Inquiry intrinsics calls to a given 'dim' are still ok
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great comment, thanks :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants