Skip to content

(Closes #3314) fix line limit bug for in-line comments#3316

Open
arporter wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
3314_line_limit_bug
Open

(Closes #3314) fix line limit bug for in-line comments#3316
arporter wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
3314_line_limit_bug

Conversation

@arporter
Copy link
Member

@arporter arporter commented Feb 3, 2026

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.95%. Comparing base (854913c) to head (1dca9f6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3316   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.95%   99.95%           
=======================================
  Files         380      380           
  Lines       53912    53933   +21     
=======================================
+ Hits        53890    53911   +21     
  Misses         22       22           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@arporter
Copy link
Member Author

arporter commented Feb 4, 2026

I've fired off the ITs. One for @LonelyCat124, @hiker or @sergisiso to review :-)

@arporter arporter self-assigned this Feb 4, 2026
@@ -143,18 +140,17 @@ def long_lines(self, fortran_in):
return False
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should long_lines also be updated? I'm not sure how hard it would be to update this to only return True for non comments/inline comments?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the very least the docstring and type hints should be updated.

Copy link
Collaborator

@LonelyCat124 LonelyCat124 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good to me - I had one question (depending on how complex long_lines would need to become) and one update to the documentation.

You also need to update the author list for these files.

@@ -143,18 +140,17 @@ def long_lines(self, fortran_in):
return False
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the very least the docstring and type hints should be updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants