Skip to content

Conversation

@anushrihub
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solution demonstrates a good understanding of basic data structures like stacks and linked lists. Here's a detailed evaluation:

  1. Exercise_1.py (Stack using list):

    • Correctness: The implementation correctly follows stack operations (push, pop, peek, etc.) using a Python list. The isEmpty() method could be more explicit by checking len(self.stacklist) == 0 instead of relying on truthiness.
    • Time Complexity: Correctly identified as O(1) for all operations except show(), which is O(n) for printing.
    • Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n) where n is the number of elements.
    • Code Quality: Well-structured and readable. The comments are helpful but could be more detailed about the approach.
    • Efficiency: No major optimizations needed for this simple implementation.
  2. Exercise_2.py (Stack using linked list):

    • Correctness: The implementation correctly follows stack operations using a linked list. The pop() method handles edge cases well (empty stack).
    • Time Complexity: Correctly identified as O(1) for push and pop operations.
    • Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n) where n is the number of elements.
    • Code Quality: Good structure and readability. The comments could explain the logic more clearly, especially for the pop() method.
    • Efficiency: No major optimizations needed.
  3. Exercise_3.py (Singly linked list):

    • Correctness: The append(), find(), and remove() methods are mostly correct. The remove() method could be simplified by breaking early once the key is found and removed.
    • Time Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n) for append, find, and remove operations.
    • Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n) where n is the number of elements.
    • Code Quality: The code is readable but could benefit from more comments explaining the logic, especially for the remove() method. The variable names are clear and descriptive.
    • Efficiency: The remove() method could be optimized by breaking the loop once the key is found and removed.

General Feedback:

  • Strengths: The student has a good grasp of basic data structures and their operations. The code is well-structured and mostly follows best practices.
  • Areas for Improvement:
    • Comments: While the comments are present, they could be more detailed, especially for complex logic like the remove() method in Exercise_3.py.
    • Edge Cases: The student should consider more edge cases, such as removing the last element in a linked list or handling empty lists/stacks.
    • Code Duplication: In Exercise_3.py, the remove() method could be simplified by breaking early once the key is found.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants