Skip to content

Conversation

@Sahithipsl470
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student has provided solutions for multiple exercises involving stack and linked list implementations in both Java and Python. Here's a detailed evaluation:

Strengths:

  1. Correctness: The implementations for stack (using array and linked list) and linked list operations are generally correct and follow standard approaches.
  2. Time Complexity: The student has correctly identified and commented the time complexities for each operation.
  3. Space Complexity: The space complexity analysis is accurate and well-documented.
  4. Code Structure: The code is well-organized with appropriate class structures and methods.
  5. Comments: The student has provided clear comments explaining their approach and logic.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Error Handling: In the stack implementations (Exercise_1 and Exercise_2), returning 0 for underflow cases might not be ideal. Consider throwing exceptions or returning null/None for better error handling.
  2. Consistency: In Exercise_1.py, the stack implementation uses a list (dynamic array) instead of a fixed-size array as in the Java version. The approaches should be consistent.
  3. Edge Cases: The linked list implementation (Exercise_3) could benefit from handling more edge cases, such as removing from an empty list or inserting at specific positions.
  4. Code Duplication: Some methods like isEmpty() and peek() have similar implementations across files. Consider creating utility functions or inheritance to reduce duplication.
  5. Python Specifics: In Exercise_1.py, the show() method returns the internal list directly, which breaks encapsulation. Consider returning a copy or a string representation instead.

Overall, the solutions are well-thought-out and demonstrate a good understanding of the data structures. The main areas for improvement are in error handling and consistency between implementations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants