Skip to content

Conversation

@PremalSamale
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Exercise_1.java:

    • Correctness: The stack implementation has several issues. The constructor incorrectly assigns capacity = MAX instead of using the parameter. The push method has a syntax error (if(top = capcity -1) should be if(top == capacity -1)). The capacity field is declared but not used properly.
    • Time Complexity: Correctly identified as O(1) for all operations.
    • Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(1) for the stack operations.
    • Code Quality: The code has syntax errors and logical issues. The constructor should use the parameter capacity instead of hardcoding MAX. The isEmpty method can be simplified to return top == -1;.
    • Efficiency: The implementation could be more efficient by properly utilizing the capacity parameter.
  2. Exercise_2.java:

    • Correctness: The stack implementation has issues. The push method incorrectly assigns top.next = newNode before updating top. This will cause the stack to lose elements. The pop method uses Node instead of StackNode.
    • Time Complexity: Correctly identified as O(1) for all operations.
    • Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(1) for the stack operations.
    • Code Quality: The code has syntax errors (return true missing semicolon). The isEmpty method can be simplified to return top == null;. The push method logic is incorrect.
    • Efficiency: The implementation could be more efficient by fixing the push method logic.
  3. Exercise_3.java:

    • Correctness: The linked list implementation is mostly correct. The insert method correctly handles both empty and non-empty lists.
    • Time Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n) for insertion (due to traversal to the end).
    • Space Complexity: Correctly identified as O(n) for the linked list.
    • Code Quality: The code is well-structured and readable. The printList method could be more concise by removing the redundant print statement.
    • Efficiency: The implementation is efficient for a singly linked list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants