Skip to content

Conversation

@PranathiDeepak
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Problem1.sql (Consecutive Numbers):

    • Correctness: The solution correctly identifies consecutive numbers by joining the logs table with itself and checking for three consecutive IDs with the same number.
    • Time Complexity: O(n^3) due to the triple self-join, which could be inefficient for large datasets.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the intermediate join results.
    • Code Quality: The code is clear and concise. Using DISTINCT ensures no duplicates in the result.
    • Improvement: Consider using window functions (if available) for better performance with large datasets.
  2. Problem2.sql (Passengers and Buses):

    • Correctness: The solution correctly matches passengers to the earliest bus they can catch and counts passengers per bus.
    • Time Complexity: O(n log n) for the join and group by operations.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for the CTE storage.
    • Code Quality: Well-structured with a CTE for clarity. The LEFT JOIN ensures all buses are included.
    • Improvement: The query could be optimized by adding indexes on arrival_time columns.
  3. Problem3.sql (Active Users):

    • Correctness: The solution correctly counts distinct active users per day within the specified date range.
    • Time Complexity: O(n) for scanning the table and grouping.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing grouped results.
    • Code Quality: Simple and effective. The date range condition is clear.
    • Improvement: Consider using BETWEEN for date range for better readability.
  4. Problem4.sql (Pivot Products):

    • Correctness: The dynamic pivot implementation is correct and handles variable store names.
    • Time Complexity: O(n) for building the dynamic SQL and executing it.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the dynamic SQL string.
    • Code Quality: Excellent use of dynamic SQL and proper handling of GROUP_CONCAT length.
    • Improvement: None needed; this is a well-implemented solution.

Overall, the solutions are correct and demonstrate good SQL knowledge. The main areas for improvement are performance optimization for large datasets and minor readability enhancements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants