Skip to content

fdi.ssh accepts only the value '1'#4635

Open
stejskalleos wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
stejskalleos:ls/ssh1
Open

fdi.ssh accepts only the value '1'#4635
stejskalleos wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
stejskalleos:ls/ssh1

Conversation

@stejskalleos
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

fdi.ssh accepts only the value '1'. The true value doesn't work.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

theforeman/foreman-discovery-image#178

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18; orcharhino 7.6)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4; orcharhino 7.5)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Feb 4, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style-wise LGTM

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Feb 4, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@jafiala jafiala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants