Skip to content

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Feb 11, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

jacobtylerwalls and others added 11 commits February 10, 2026 09:46
It's not clear that CLAs are needed to ensure contributors are
assenting to our license (the "inbound=outbound" agreement),
but we can keep them around for contributors who would like to
(or are required by their employer) to submit one, without
investing additional resources in checking every single contribution.

See https://forum.djangoproject.com/t/cla-vs-dco-for-django-contributors/42399
and recent board minutes.
It's how Django formats values internally and makes tests compatible
with databases that use non-integer primary keys.
As a side effect from adding explicit license files to conform to PEP 639, the
AUTHORS file got dropped from the wheel. The tarball still contained this file.

In the "Python Packaging User Guide"
(https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/writing-pyproject-toml/#license-files)
the AUTHORS file is modeled to be included in license-files.

Follow-up to 96a7a65.
…th deferred annotations.

Provide a wrapper for safe introspection of user functions on Python 3.14+.

Follow-up to 6019147.
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 11, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Feb 11, 2026
@pull pull bot merged commit 7732f94 into threatcode:main Feb 11, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants