🧠 Explore a new moral-cognitive framework that redefines knowledge as care through the lens of epistemic intimacy in relationships.

A repository for the dataset collected from annotating tweets for within-person dissonance.

A theoretical synthesis introducing epistemic psychology—a framework uniting cognition, ethics, and relational science. Based on the Kahl Model of Epistemic Dissonance (KMED-R), it reconceptualises knowing as fiduciary care and introduces FBT, TACM, and the Intimate Epistemic Oath as tools for diagnosing trust and dependence.

A groundbreaking study in fiduciary-epistemic theory that reimagines the modern university as a constitutional guardian of knowledge. It exposes how marketisation and managerialism erode truth, compares universities to hybrid AI firms, and proposes legal reform to restore candour, accountability, and public trust in knowledge.

KMED-I models the newborn’s cry as the first epistemic event, simulating caregiver responses—fiduciary, inconsistent, neglectful, or silencing—and their impact on autonomy, dissonance tolerance, and dependence. A computational tool for developmental psychology, psychiatry, and epistemic theory.

Comprehensive evaluation of Claude 4 Sonnet's mathematical assessment capabilities: 500 original problems revealing JSON-induced errors and systematic patterns in LLM evaluation tasks. Research demonstrates 100% accuracy on incorrect answers but 84.3% on correct ones due to premature decision-making in JSON structure.

This paper reframes the newborn’s first cry as the primordial epistemic claim—the embodied registration of contradiction and dependence at life’s threshold. Drawing on developmental research, attachment theory, and KMED-I simulations, it shows how caregiver responses form fiduciary scaffolds shaping autonomy, resilience, and trust.

Experimental Psychology Paradigm

This paper extends Epistemic Clientelism Theory into intimate life, introducing the Kahl Model of Epistemic Dissonance (KMED). It shows how love, recognition, and autonomy can be modelled mathematically and simulated in Python, offering a new foundation for epistemic psychology and fiduciary ethics.

A philosophical and fiduciary analysis expanding on Joel Suss’s Financial Times “Free Lunch” column (26 Oct 2025). This paper argues that America’s polarised economy reflects a fiduciary collapse of trust across political, corporate, and civic systems, proposing epistemic humility as a framework for renewal.

A landmark interdisciplinary study that redefines cognitive dissonance and trust as foundations of knowing. Not a psychology paper but a theory-of-knowledge manifesto in psychological form—bridging mind, ethics, and governance.

This paper reconceptualises Nazi camp guards as epistemic subjects shaped by systemic betrayal, integrating classical psychology with Kahl’s Epistemic Clientelism Theory and fiduciary–epistemic duties. It redefines atrocity as epistemic failure and authority as fiduciary trusteeship, proposing safeguards for pluralism and atrocity prevention.

The Fiduciary Mind redefines cognition as a moral–epistemic process grounded in trust, candour, and care. Extending What Happens When You Clap?, it develops a phenomenology of fiduciary cognition where dissonance signals ethical imbalance and knowing becomes a reciprocal act of truth-keeping between mind and world.

Applied case study extending Peter Kahl’s Authoritarianism and the Architecture of Obedience. Examines the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! under Trump’s second term as an instance of authoritarian epistemic capture. Reframes obedience as epistemic submission and explores fiduciary–epistemic scaffolds for resistance.

Analysis of the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests through Epistemic Clientelism Theory, showing how scaffold collapse produced epistemic capture and democratic lessons.

🧠 Reconceptualize cognitive dissonance as an epistemic event, exploring its impact on freedom, anxiety, and conformity through a philosophical lens.

This paper reinterprets cognitive dissonance as structural to epistemic life. Drawing on philosophy, psychology, and fiduciary law, it shows how collapse yields illusory freedom, while fiduciary scaffolds enable bounded freedom, epistemic resilience, and institutional pluralism.

Epistemic Psychology re-founds psychology as the science of human autonomy and dependence under epistemic conditions. Moving from pathology to ontology, and from description to prescription, it integrates dissonance, clientelism, and fiduciary scaffolds into a diagnostic and normative research programme.