Skip to content

Wagtail 50#20

Open
nickmoreton wants to merge 8 commits intounexceptable:masterfrom
torchbox-forks:wagtail-50
Open

Wagtail 50#20
nickmoreton wants to merge 8 commits intounexceptable:masterfrom
torchbox-forks:wagtail-50

Conversation

@nickmoreton
Copy link
Contributor

This updates the package for Wagtail 5.0 support.

Support ticket: https://torchbox.monday.com/boards/1124794299/pulses/1131920812

There's no reason the package wouldn't work on versions since 4.1

This adds some testing for the latest version of Django and Wagtail

This builds on PR: #19

@nickmoreton nickmoreton marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2023 15:30
- name: Test with tox
id: test-with-tox
run: |
tox
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for adding this

py{38,39,310}-dj{32,40}-wt{216,30,40}
py{39,310}-dj{41}-wt{40,41}
py{38,39,310}-dj{32,41,42}-wt{41,42,50}
py{311}-dj{41,42}-wt{41,42,50}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this can be condensed, this is good, but for some reason, it fails for me in another package:
https://github.com/katdom13/wagtailmenus/actions/runs/5217610335/jobs/9417615529

it seems like Wagtail 4.1 and 4.2 don't really support Django 4.2

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@katdom13 You are right, I made a change thanks.

@katdom13
Copy link

katdom13 commented Jun 9, 2023

Hi @nickmoreton , LGTM,
just has this one to consider:
https://github.com/unexceptable/wagtail-robots/pull/20/files#r1223984279

@nickmoreton nickmoreton requested a review from katdom13 June 9, 2023 12:16
@ozgur-as
Copy link

you might wanna consider changing the requirement of wagtail.contrib.modeladmin since it's now deprecated.

@katdom13
Copy link

Hi @nickmoreton ,
This can be closed now. Superseded by: #23
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants