fix: update coverage.include and coverage.exclude #9426
+22
−15
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes
coverage.include/coverage.excludeglob matching so it behaves liketest.include/test.exclude(relative to the project root), addressing Vitest v4 regressions reported in #9395.In v4, matching was done against the full (absolute) filename with
picomatchusingcontains: trueandignore, which made patterns such as./*.tsor**/foo/**unexpectedly match parts of the absolute path (including the CWD), causing everything to be excluded.This change:
./*.tswork as expected./.../foo/...), by using relative paths for in-project files and only using the absolute filename for truly external files.allowExternal: falsesemantics by skipping external files instead of incorrectly failing matches for everything.fix #9395
Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Tests
pnpm test:ci.Documentation
pnpm run docscommand.Changesets
feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.