giac: update to 1.9.0.29.#40491
Merged
classabbyamp merged 1 commit intovoid-linux:masterfrom Nov 24, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Also: use openblas instead of lapack when available.
Contributor
|
is it expected that now giac does not depend on blas or lapack on x86_64-musl? I only realised it now, after xbps-remove -oO, and guessed this pr made the change. |
Contributor
Author
Yes. I've been changing packages to prefer using openblas rather than lapack when available. See for example #39846 (SuiteSparse, cvxopt) and #40224 (igraph) which are awaiting merge. The point is that lapack is just a portable reference implementation of blas/lapack that is replaceable by an optimized implementation like openblas (or the one by intel, but I don't think it's free). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Testing the changes