Snap packages run confined under a restrictive security sandbox by default. The security policies and store policies work together to allow developers to quickly update their applications and to provide safety to end users.

This document describes how to configure the security policies for snap packages and builds upon the packaging declaration as defined in meta.md.

Security policy is typically defined by declaring a security template and any additional security groups to extend the policy provided by the template. If unspecified, default confinement allows the snap to run as a network client.

Applications are tracked by the system by using the concept of an ApplicationId. The APP_ID is the composition of the package name, the app's origin namespace from the store (if applicable-- only snaps of type: app (the default) have an origin namespace as part of their APP_ID), the service/binary name and package version. The APP_ID takes the form of <pkgname>.<namespace>_<appname>_<version>. For example, if this is in package.yaml:

name: foo
version: 0.1
...
services:
  - name: bar
    start: bin/bar

and the app was uploaded to the myorigin namespace in the store, then the APP_ID for the bar service is foo.myorigin_bar_0.1. The APP_ID is used throughout the system including in the enforcement of security policy by the app launcher. The launcher will:

• setup various environment variables (eg, SNAP_APP_ARCH, SNAP_APP_DATA_PATH, SNAP_APP_PATH, SNAP_APP_TMPDIR, SNAP_APP_USER_DATA_PATH, SNAP_OLD_PWD, HOME and TMPDIR (set to SNAP_APP_TMPDIR). See the snappy FHS for details.
• chdir to SNAP_APP_PATH (the install directory)
• setup a device cgroup and add any devices which are assigned to this app
• setup the seccomp filter
• exec the app under AppArmor profile under a default nice value

The launcher will be used when launching both services and when using CLI binaries. The launcher enforces application isolation as per the snappy FHS.

Upon snap package install, package.yaml is examined and AppArmor profiles are generated for each service and binary to have names based on the APP_ID. As mentioned, AppArmor profiles are template based and may be extended through policy groups, which are expressed in the yaml as caps.

Upon snap package install, package.yaml is examined and seccomp filters are generated for each service and binary. Like with AppArmor, seccomp filters are template based and may be extended through filter groups, which are expressed in the yaml as caps.

The package.yaml need not specify anything for default confinement. Several options are available to modify the confinement:

• caps: (optional) list of (easy to understand, human readable) additional security policies to add. The system will translate these to generate AppArmor and seccomp policy. Note: these are separate from capabilities(7). Specify caps: [] to indicate no additional caps. When caps and security-template are not specified, caps defaults to client networking. Not compatible with security-override or security-policy.
• AppArmor access is deny by default and apps are restricted to their app-specific directories, libraries, etc (enforcing ro, rw, etc). Additional access beyond what is allowed by the declared security-template is declared via this option
• seccomp is deny by default. Enough safe syscalls are allowed so that apps using the declared security-template should work. Additional access beyond what is allowed by the security-template is declared via this option
• security-template: (optional) alternate security template to use instead of default. When specified without caps, caps defaults to being empty. Not compatible with security-override or security-policy.
• security-override: (optional) high level overrides to use when security-template and caps are not sufficient - see advanced usage for details. Not compatible with caps, security-template or security-policy
• apparmor: path/to/security.override
• seccomp: path/to/filter.override
• security-policy: (optional) hand-crafted low-level raw security policy to use instead of using default template-based security policy. Not compatible with caps, security-template or security-override.
• apparmor: path/to/profile
• seccomp: path/to/filter

Eg, consider the following:

name: foo
version: 1.0
services:
  - name: bar
  - name: baz
    caps:
      - network-client
      - norf-framework_client
  - name: qux
    security-template: nondefault
  - name: quux
    security-policy:
      apparmor: meta/quux.profile
      seccomp: meta/quux.filter
  - name: corge
    security-override:
      apparmor: meta/corge.apparmor
      seccomp: meta/corge.seccomp
binaries:
  - name: cli-exe
    caps: []

If this package is uploaded to the store in the myorigin namespace, then:

• APP_ID for bar is foo.myorigin_bar_1.0. It uses the default template and network-client (default) cap
• APP_ID for baz is foo.myorigin_baz_1.0. It uses the default template and the network-client and norf-framework_client caps
• APP_ID for qux is foo.myorigin_qux_1.0. It uses the nondefault template and network-client (default) cap
• APP_ID for quux is foo.myorigin_quux_1.0. It does not use a security-template or caps but instead ships its own AppArmor policy in meta/quux.profile and seccomp filters in meta/quux.filter
• APP_ID for corge is foo.myorigin_corge_1.0. It does not use a security-template or caps but instead ships the override files meta/corge.apparmor and meta/corge.seccomp.
• APP_ID for cli-exe is foo.myorigin_cli-exe_1.0. It uses the default template and no caps

As mentioned, security policies and store policies work together to provide flexibility, speed and safety. Use of some of the above will trigger a manual review in the official Ubuntu store for snaps that are type: app (the default):

• security-policy - always triggers a manual review because it allows specifying access beyond the application specific areas
• caps - will only trigger a manual review if specifying a reserved cap
• security-template - will only trigger a manual review if specifying a reserved tempate (eg, unconfined)
• security-override - will only trigger a manual review if specifying access beyond that provided by common access.

Apps should typically only use common groups with caps and common templates with security-template and avoid security-policy and security-override.

Snaps that are of type: framework (see frameworks.md) will use any of the above (since framework snaps' purpose is to extend the system and require additional privilege).

The available templates and policy groups of the target system can be seen by running snappy-security list on the target system.

The following is planned:

• launcher:
• setup additional cgroups (tag network traffic, memory)
• setup iptables using cgroup tags (for internal app access)
• drop privileges to uid of service
• sockets: (optional) AF_UNIX abstract socket definition for coordinated snap communications. Abstract sockets will be namespaced and yaml is such that (client) apps wanting to use the socket don't have to declare anything extra, but they don't have access unless the (server) binary declaring the socket says that app is ok).
• names: (optional) list of abstract socket names (<name>_<binaryname> is prepended)
• allowed-clients: <name>.<namespace> or <name>.<namespace>_<binaryname> (ie, omit version and binaryname to allow all from snap <name>.<namespace> or omit version to allow only binaryname from snap <name>)

Eg:

    name: foo
    ...
    services:
      - name: bar
      sockets:
        names:
          - sock1
          - sock2
          - ...
        allowed-clients:
          - baz
          - norf_qux
          - ...