Skip to content

fix(mcp): update default search api endpoint#53

Open
VijayKumarMidde wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
update_search_url
Open

fix(mcp): update default search api endpoint#53
VijayKumarMidde wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
update_search_url

Conversation

@VijayKumarMidde
Copy link
Member

@VijayKumarMidde VijayKumarMidde commented Feb 12, 2026

Updates the default search API endpoint from https://ydc-index.io/v1/search to https://api.you.com/v1/agents/search. This new unified endpoint provides better support for both authenticated and free requests with integrated rate limiting.

@VijayKumarMidde VijayKumarMidde requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2026 23:56
@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Claude finished @VijayKumarMidde's task in 1m 43s —— View job


Code Review Complete ✅

Todo List

  • Gather existing PR feedback
  • Read changed file to understand the modification
  • Review against project standards
  • Check for related test files
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR updates the default search API endpoint from https://ydc-index.io/v1/search to https://api.you.com/v1/agents/search. The change is a single-line modification in packages/api/src/shared/api.constants.ts:8.

Review Feedback

✅ Strengths

  1. Clean, focused change - Single constant update with clear intent
  2. Tests pass - All 60 tests pass after the change, including tests that verify SEARCH_API_URL is used correctly
  3. Environment override preserved - The process.env.YDC_SEARCH_API_URL override still works, allowing users to configure their own endpoint
  4. No breaking changes - The API interface remains the same; only the default URL changes

🤔 Questions & Concerns

  1. Missing PR description - No description provided to explain:

    • Why the endpoint is changing (new API version? deprecation? better performance?)
    • Whether this is a breaking change for existing users
    • If the old endpoint will continue to work or be deprecated
    • Migration guidance if needed
  2. Commit message scope mismatch - The commit message says fix(mcp): but changes the api package. Should be:

    fix(api): update default search api endpoint
    

    See AGENTS.md for Conventional Commits scope guidelines.

  3. Documentation gap - No documentation updates to explain the new endpoint:

    • README.md doesn't mention the endpoint URL
    • No CHANGELOG.md entry documenting the change
    • No migration guide if the old endpoint is being deprecated
  4. No verification of new endpoint - It's unclear if:

    • The new endpoint is already live and tested
    • It returns the same response schema
    • It has the same rate limits and quotas
    • Integration tests would catch any incompatibilities

📋 Recommendations

Before merging:

  1. Add PR description explaining the motivation and impact Fix this →

  2. Fix commit message scope - Should be fix(api): not fix(mcp): Fix this →

  3. Consider integration test - Add a .docker.ts test that verifies the new endpoint works with a real API key (see .agents/rules/testing.md for Docker test patterns)

  4. Document in CHANGELOG - If this package maintains a changelog, add an entry explaining the change

Nice to have:

  • Add a comment in api.constants.ts explaining why this specific endpoint is used
  • If the old endpoint is deprecated, consider logging a warning for users who override with the old URL

Code Quality

The code itself follows the project's standards:

  • ✅ Proper TypeScript conventions
  • ✅ Environment variable override pattern maintained
  • ✅ Existing tests validate the change
  • ✅ No security concerns

Verdict

Conditionally approve with required fixes:

  • ✅ Code change is correct and well-tested
  • ⚠️ Needs proper PR description
  • ⚠️ Needs commit message scope fix
  • ⚠️ Would benefit from documentation update

The technical implementation is sound, but the change lacks context and documentation. Once the PR description explains the "why" and the commit scope is fixed, this should be safe to merge.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant