Update DNSSEC01 implementation#1474
Conversation
matsduf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"/usr/local/bin/perl" "-Iinc" "-MExtUtils::Manifest=fullcheck" -e fullcheck
Not in MANIFEST: t/Test-dnssec01.data
Not in MANIFEST: t/Test-dnssec01.t
|
I get strange output from Some debug output? |
5a4ac59 to
a7ac7bf
Compare
|
@matsduf All unit tests now pass and your comments have been addressed, please re-review. |
a7ac7bf to
c92e7a3
Compare
--> Not OK, expects |
--> Not OK, expects |
matsduf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All scenarios give correct tags in output, but two scenarios give incomplete argument.
This will be fixed once #1475 is merged and this PR is rebased/updated on top. |
c92e7a3 to
13ba9bb
Compare
|
Unit test data for |
I suggest that the failing tests are marked as TODO. What test cases are affected? I could possibly create scenarios for them. |
|
Scenarios |
Many. But it should be fixed before end of development. |
I ran into the same problem when preparing #1475. I was able to fix Have you tried rebasing your branch on the latest state of |
1a58048 to
0ec174f
Compare
|
@matsduf @marc-vanderwal please re-review, unit tests have been re-recorded (the test zones are back online). |
0ec174f to
7e04f1b
Compare
7e04f1b to
95f832f
Compare
|
@matsduf I've fixed some conflicts after merging other PRs, please re-review |
|
Tested and all unit tests pass. |
Purpose
This PR proposes an update of test case DNSSEC01 implementation.
Context
Test case specification: zonemaster/zonemaster#1412
Test scenarios specification: zonemaster/zonemaster#1413
Changes
How to test this PR
Unit tests are created and should pass.