Conversation
Blindly copy-pasted from IRDB.....
|
Fails because #30 isn't in yet. Although I'd prefer merging this first, to get a nice green check on the other one. But either way will be fine... |
hugobuddel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Requiring a user to manually start the job was deliberate, because it takes two hours.
But perhaps having the job not run for draft PRs is good enough. It is nice to get a checkmark yes.
We can always change it back.
|
It just occurred to me that the main workflow can create a PR if there's newly downloaded data (indeed the original purpose of this!), could this mean we might end up in a recursion here? Maybe only trigger this with a specific label or give the auto PR a label and don't fire when that's there... |
The automated PR already has a unique label, so can just use that to avoid the risk of eternal loops...
Oops; thanks. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.