Skip to content

Conversation

@tom-englert
Copy link

Fix for NuGet/Home#304

@dnfclas
Copy link

dnfclas commented Oct 16, 2015

Hi @tom-englert, I'm your friendly neighborhood .NET Foundation Pull Request Bot (You can call me DNFBOT). Thanks for your contribution!

In order for us to evaluate and accept your PR, we ask that you sign a contribution license agreement. It's all electronic and will take just minutes. I promise there's no faxing. https://cla2.dotnetfoundation.org.

TTYL, DNFBOT;

@dnfclas
Copy link

dnfclas commented Oct 16, 2015

@tom-englert, Thanks for signing the contribution license agreement so quickly! Actual humans will now validate the agreement and then evaluate the PR.

Thanks, DNFBOT;

@yishaigalatzer
Copy link
Contributor

Sweet, thanks for sticking through this long process! We will take a look

CC @tmat

@yishaigalatzer
Copy link
Contributor

@tom-englert Can you please add a test case ?

@tom-englert
Copy link
Author

@yishaigalatzer this is just wrapping existing stuff that is already unit tested (it does not make sense unit-testing DisSymReader here). I'm not the friend of adding dummy unit tests just for the sake of having a unit test.
This would need some integration test, but I see no framework for this.

@yishaigalatzer
Copy link
Contributor

Completely agree. Command line tests in nuget.client repo are where the integration tests live.

Yishai


From: Tom Englertmailto:notifications@github.com
Sent: ‎10/‎17/‎2015 1:13 AM
To: NuGet/NuGet2mailto:NuGet2@noreply.github.com
Cc: Yishai Galatzermailto:yigalatz@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [NuGet2] Add missing source files referenced by PDB. (#19)

@yishaigalatzerhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fgithub.com%2fyishaigalatzer&data=01%7c01%7cyigalatz%40microsoft.com%7c092e355146064ee4e6c408d2d6cae03c%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=yq2umMiCT0X3XoBpH%2ft9H%2fKKMxjZNDrqB8DdLteJHjY%3d this is just wrapping existing stuff that is already unit tested (it does not make sense unit-testing DisSymReader here). I'm not the friend of adding dummy unit tests just for the sake of having a unit test.
This would need some integration test, but I see no framework for this.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fgithub.com%2fNuGet%2fNuGet2%2fpull%2f19%23issuecomment-148894887&data=01%7c01%7cyigalatz%40microsoft.com%7c092e355146064ee4e6c408d2d6cae03c%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=DOp0JoPJw05tE3KLYxojQiPFTIVqZT57EvhUM4xpjmc%3d.

xavierdecoster and others added 2 commits October 19, 2015 19:28
attempt to purge temp cache completely when no cached expanded folder…
@yishaigalatzer
Copy link
Contributor

@tmat - When do you plan to turn the RC into RTM?
@tom-englert - This need to go into the 2.10 branch rather than 2.9 branch

@tmat
Copy link

tmat commented Oct 20, 2015

Within a week or so.

@tom-englert
Copy link
Author

replaced with #23 based on 2.10 branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants