Conversation
kba
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2025
Member
kba
left a comment
kba
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! As discussed last week, I'm fine with removing the processor server.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When planning Ocrd-Network, we considered two types of processors to use: the Processing Worker and the Processor Server. In pull request 468 in ocrd all the Processor Server is not used but still ocrd-network offers the whole capability like the previous native installation. In addition, the Processing Worker provides largely the same functions as the Processor Server, making the Processor Server largely redundant.
Removing the Processor Server simplifies the code and reduces the effort required for maintenance and understanding the code.