Skip to content

Add blog post: South Carolina H.3492 partially refundable EITC#611

Merged
MaxGhenis merged 16 commits intomainfrom
blog/sc-h3492-eitc-refundability
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

Add blog post: South Carolina H.3492 partially refundable EITC#611
MaxGhenis merged 16 commits intomainfrom
blog/sc-h3492-eitc-refundability

Conversation

@DTrim99
Copy link
Contributor

@DTrim99 DTrim99 commented Jan 26, 2026

Summary

  • Adds blog post analyzing South Carolina H.3492, which would make 25% of the excess state EITC refundable
  • Key findings: $403M cost, benefits 23.3% of SC residents, reduces child poverty by 4.8%

Related

Test plan

  • Verify blog post renders correctly
  • Update REFORM_LINK_PLACEHOLDER with actual PolicyEngine reform URL
  • Add chart embeds once chart repo is deployed

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Analysis of SC H.3492, which would make 25% of the excess state EITC
refundable. Key findings:
- $403 million cost to state
- Benefits 23.3% of SC residents
- Reduces poverty by 2.1%, child poverty by 4.8%

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 26, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
policyengine-app-v2 Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 4, 2026 5:39pm
policyengine-calculator Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 4, 2026 5:39pm
policyengine-website Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 4, 2026 5:39pm

Request Review

- Add household impacts section with net income change chart
- Add winners by decile chart in statewide impacts
- Add average benefit by decile chart

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@daphnehanse11 daphnehanse11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@MaxGhenis MaxGhenis merged commit 7defc20 into main Feb 4, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants