-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Adjust Logs #153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Adjust Logs #153
Conversation
|
|
||
| message RuntimeErrorLog { | ||
| int64 node_id = 1; | ||
| string error = 2; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the error message or just a error type?
| message SuccessLog { | ||
| int64 node_id = 1; | ||
| shared.Value result = 2; | ||
| repeated shared.Value parameter = 3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Naming is a little bit confusing. Its not the parameter its the input value for each value
| } | ||
|
|
||
| message SuccessLog { | ||
| int64 node_id = 1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are you just using the index of the database id or also the complete id, because that its a string
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm using the database id that Sagittarius is giving me. In that case its an index
Resolves: #152
The idea: instead of returning just application logs we can also log the result of evey node_function.
Instead of having just
Logwe would have:ApplicationLog=> Log from the ApplicationSuccessLog=> Result of a successful node_function executionRuntimeErrorLog=> Result of an unsuccessful node_function executionWhat do you think @Taucher2003 @nicosammito