Conversation
|
NOTE: This is for mitchellh/vagrant-google#102 |
|
ping @Temikus .. was hoping to get this in quickly per discussion on other GH issue. |
|
@criccomini Sorry for the delay, this is a free time project and it’s been a very busy week. I’ll address this Saturday AEDT |
|
Thanks! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #434 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.94% 84.92% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 339 339
Lines 5825 5826 +1
==========================================
Hits 4948 4948
- Misses 877 878 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Temikus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall LGTM. See 2 small comments.
| { | ||
| :auto_delete => auto_delete, | ||
| :boot => true, | ||
| :autoDelete => auto_delete, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
auto_delete and autoDelete should be interchangeable in google-api-client.
Or does auto_delete not function correctly anymore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch! Changed to auto_delete .
| get_disk(writable, true, auto_delete) | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| def get_disk(writable = true, boot = false, auto_delete = false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since we already have disks.get, I think it'll make more sense to name this get_as_hash or something similar to avoid confusion, WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As there is a get_as_boot_disk, how about get_as_disk?
|
@criccomini @whynick1 Ok, looking closer this is already implemented in the lib. The method seems to have just moved to collection method Example: This is probably what you're looking for, right? |
|
Hi @Temikus , sorry for the late reply as I was on my vocation😅 I have updated PR regarding your comment. Thanks! For |
|
@whynick1 No worries! So, I may be misunderstanding something here but I double-checked and am able to create an instance with an attached non-boot disk using this method. Example code: Return: Or am I missing something here? |
|
@Temikus You are right! 👍 Meanwhile, I made some change to vagrant-google to support Please let me know what you think! Thanks! cc @criccomini |
|
@whynick1 Great! I'll close out this PR in favor of the vagrant one. |

Based on the discuss here vagrant-google, to allow mounting additional (non-boot) disks, we need to make some change accordingly.
Could you take a look at this patch? @Temikus