feat: Add docker backend

[briangallagher]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds a docker backend, extending the current Kubernetes and Local Process backends.
Its designed for Local Execution

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in Fixes #<issue number>, #<issue number>, ... format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):

Fixes #108

Verification
This WIP PR to add an example notebook for local docker execution can be used to verify this PR
Update the pip install to:
!pip install "git+https://github.com/briangallagher/sdk.git@docker-backend#egg=kubeflow[docker]"

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign astefanutti for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 18128142359

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 71.739%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 17979146135:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	297
Relevant Lines:	414

---

💛 - Coveralls

[astefanutti]

Suggested change

	DOCKER_LABEL_PREFIX = "trainer.kubeflow.ai"
	DOCKER_LABEL_PREFIX = "trainer.kubeflow.org"

[astefanutti]

How difficult would it be to support Podman as well: https://pypi.org/project/podman/

Should it be a different backend or could this be a "container" backend that could work for both Docker and Podman depending on what's installed / configured?

[briangallagher]

I think it's a little bit cleaner to have a separate backend as it uses the podman client and the code is a bit different. The networking is slightly different.
But, a nice addition might be some auto discovery after all backends are added.
Meaning, look for Podman, then docker finally fall back to subprocess.

[andreyvelich]

I would agree with @astefanutti to unify all container-based functionality under single backend.
From the end-user point of view it doesn't matter whether they use Docker, Podman, or Container backend to run local containers.

[briangallagher]

Closing this, the code will be merged into #119