Conversation
|
Hi, maybe it's better to continue the discussion #592 (comment) here (cc @janedbal) There is a lot of failure on this draft but if I understand correctly the one exposed by your reproducer is which is similar to the sentence
I'm sure you've already noticed that For the where situation I had last time a "solution" to use a BenevolentUnion #447 ; I dunno if the PR handled the IDENTITY/join issues but it may be possible to do it. This would allow |
|
My point of view:
|
|
If I update the "failing test" you added @ondrejmirtes by changing -> with If the fact that Currently I solve my issues with changing every call to |
No description provided.