Skip to content

Conversation

@micprog
Copy link
Member

@micprog micprog commented Jul 26, 2024

No description provided.

@micprog micprog force-pushed the dma branch 3 times, most recently from 684ccf1 to 9401d64 Compare July 29, 2024 16:20
Copy link

@Scheremo Scheremo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty decent to me, left some comments and questions.

Comment on lines +18 to +21
parameter int unsigned NarrowDataWidth = 0,
/// Data Width for the Wide Ports
parameter int unsigned WideDataWidth = 0,
/// Latency of downstream memory for

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT: Might be a good idea to also add reasonable defaults here

/// Data Width for the Wide Ports
parameter int unsigned WideDataWidth = 0,
/// Latency of downstream memory for
parameter int unsigned MemoryLatency = 2,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this parameter do? Is is functionally relevant?

for (genvar i = 0; i < 2; i++) begin : gen_rready_convert
spill_register #(
.T (obi_a_chan_t ),
.Bypass ( '0 )

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these bypasses always necessary? Seems to me they are mostly relevant for timing.
Might be a good idea to extract their existence as a parameter.

Comment on lines +111 to +113
.NumRegs (32'd1),
.NumStreams (32'd1),
.IdCounterWidth(32),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this config reasonable?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants