Skip to content

Conversation

@bsutherland333
Copy link
Member

An autotuner for ROSplane would make it much easier for people to use, so this is a gradient-based optimization approach for an autotuner.

bsutherland333 and others added 28 commits March 12, 2024 17:13
@bsutherland333 bsutherland333 linked an issue Apr 3, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@bsutherland333 bsutherland333 self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
josephward and others added 25 commits April 2, 2024 20:43
… acccount for working with jacobian, at bracketing with bugfixing.
…ther options we want to change based on the gains, we can add them there as well.
@bsutherland333
Copy link
Member Author

I also don't know if I'm going to have time to finish this. The approach we were using before of a gradient based optimization is a flawed approach I think, as it requires too many step iterations to converge. A system identification type method would be better. However, much of the work we did here was simply creating the functionality we needed to have the autopilot perform an automated sequence to measure the system response. That portion of this work would probably still be useful for a system identification type approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Autotune for ROSplane

3 participants